FICTIONAL EXAMPLE. The organisation, documents, figures and events are invented.

Impact note: amended outsourcing guideline

Organisation settings (fictional)

The brief (fictional)

Author pastes a fictional "Outsourcing Guideline, Amendment 2" from the fictional Meridian Prudential Authority (S1), the current Outsourcing Policy v6 (S2) and the material contracts list (S3).

DRAFT. Classification: Restricted. Prepared with corp-reg-change v1.0.0. Not signed off.

Outsourcing Guideline, Amendment 2. Meridian Prudential Authority. Final, issued 2 October. Starts 1 July, no transition [S1 para.1].

Bottom line

Material outsourcing must now have a tested exit plan, and the authority must be told 20 business days before signing rather than 10. First date that matters: any contract signed from 1 July.

What the rule changes

TopicEarlierNew
Notice to authority10 business days [S1 para.12, as struck out]"must notify at least 20 business days before signing" [S1 para.12]
Exit plan"should maintain" [S1 para.18, as struck out]"must maintain and test at least annually" [S1 para.18]

Does it apply to us

Applies: the guideline covers all authorised banks [S1 para.2]. Final call: Head of Compliance.

Affected areas

Outsourcing Policy v6 sections 4 and 7 [S2]. Three contracts on the material list [S3]. System changes: none shown in the sources.

Gap assessment

RequirementCurrent positionGap
20-day noticePolicy says 10 days [S2 s.4.2]Yes
Annual exit testExit plans required; testing not mentioned [S2 s.7]Yes
Test records for three material contractsNo source suppliedUnknown

Actions

ActionOwnerDue
Amend Policy v6 s.4.2 and s.7 [PROPOSED]Head of Third-Party Risk31 March
Confirm exit-test status for three contracts [PROPOSED]Contract owners28 February

Open questions

Does "test" require a live failover, or is a desktop exercise enough? For counsel, then the authority.

Sources. S1 Amendment 2. S2 Outsourcing Policy v6. S3 Material contracts list.
Sign-off. Head of Compliance: ____ Chief Risk Officer: ____